Hakan Gullu, Mustafa Caliskan, Ozgur Ciftci, Dogan Erdogan, Semra Topcu, Erkan Yildirim, Aylin Yildirir, Haldun Muderrisoglu
1 ) Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Cardiology Department, Ankara, Turkey;
2) Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Radiology Department, Ankara, Turkey
Background: Smoking is the most prevalent and most preventable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Smoking low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes (light cigarettes) would be expected to be less hazardous than smoking regular cigarettes owing to the lower nicotine and tar yield.
Objective: To compare the chronic and acute effects of light cigarette and regular cigarette smoking on coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR).
Methods: 20 regular cigarette smokers (mean (SD) age 24.8 (5.0)), 20 light cigarette smokers (mean age 25.6 (6.4)), and 22 non-smoker healthy volunteers (mean age 25.1 (4.2)) were included. First, each subject underwent echocardiographic examination, including CFVR measurement, after a 12 hour fasting and smokeless period. Two days later, each subject smoked two of their normal cigarettes in a closed room within 15 minutes. Finally, within 20–30 minutes, each subject underwent an echocardiographic examination, including CFVR measurement.
Results: Mean (SD) CFVR values were similar in light cigarette and regular cigarette smokers and significantly lower than in the controls (2.68 (0.50), 2.65 (0.61), 3.11 (0.53), p = 0.013). Before and after smoking a paired t test showed that smoking two light cigarettes acutely decreased the CFVR from 2.68 (0.50) to 2.05 (0.43) (p = 0.001), and smoking of two regular cigarettes acutely decreased CFVR from 2.65 (0.61) to 2.18 (0.48) (p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Our study suggest that reducing the nicotine and tar yield is not sufficient for a cigarette to be called less hazardous, and other noxious compounds in cigarettes continue to compromise human health. Smoking low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes seems to have the same unfavourable effect on the coronary microvascular functions as smoking regular cigarettes. Action should be taken to prohibit misleading terminology such as "light".
1 ) Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Cardiology Department, Ankara, Turkey;
2) Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Radiology Department, Ankara, Turkey
Background: Smoking is the most prevalent and most preventable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Smoking low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes (light cigarettes) would be expected to be less hazardous than smoking regular cigarettes owing to the lower nicotine and tar yield.
Objective: To compare the chronic and acute effects of light cigarette and regular cigarette smoking on coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR).
Methods: 20 regular cigarette smokers (mean (SD) age 24.8 (5.0)), 20 light cigarette smokers (mean age 25.6 (6.4)), and 22 non-smoker healthy volunteers (mean age 25.1 (4.2)) were included. First, each subject underwent echocardiographic examination, including CFVR measurement, after a 12 hour fasting and smokeless period. Two days later, each subject smoked two of their normal cigarettes in a closed room within 15 minutes. Finally, within 20–30 minutes, each subject underwent an echocardiographic examination, including CFVR measurement.
Results: Mean (SD) CFVR values were similar in light cigarette and regular cigarette smokers and significantly lower than in the controls (2.68 (0.50), 2.65 (0.61), 3.11 (0.53), p = 0.013). Before and after smoking a paired t test showed that smoking two light cigarettes acutely decreased the CFVR from 2.68 (0.50) to 2.05 (0.43) (p = 0.001), and smoking of two regular cigarettes acutely decreased CFVR from 2.65 (0.61) to 2.18 (0.48) (p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Our study suggest that reducing the nicotine and tar yield is not sufficient for a cigarette to be called less hazardous, and other noxious compounds in cigarettes continue to compromise human health. Smoking low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes seems to have the same unfavourable effect on the coronary microvascular functions as smoking regular cigarettes. Action should be taken to prohibit misleading terminology such as "light".
Heart 2007;93:1274-1277
http://heart.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/93/10/1274
© 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society